当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

通过综合治理计划管理监管义务.pdf

上传人: le****ng 编号:616676 2025-03-07 11页 1.20MB

1、Managing Regulatory Obligations through an Integrated Governance ProgramHelen Graham,Group Chief Privacy Officer,ShellPhilipp Raether CIPP/E,Group Chief Privacy Officer,AllianzChristina Montgomery,Vice President,Chief Privacy&Trust Officer,IBMNavrina Singh,Founder and CEO Credo AIWELCOME AND INTRODU

2、CTIONSI.Introductions and agendaII.Setting the sceneIII.Overview of Integrated AI GovernanceIV.Implementing an Integrated AI Governance ProgramV.Investing in an Integrated AI Governance Framework VI.Organisational and technical measures to manage compliance tasksVII.Conclusion and Q&APROGRAM OUTLINE

3、 Enterprises Are At Various Stages of Their AI Governance Journey.Needs vary from education to tooling across this readiness scale.2023 Survey of over 1000 organizations6(Gen)AI Risk Oversight|In the market,we see four different archetypes for(Gen)AI risk oversightArchetype 1Business/Strategy Office

4、Responsible AI Governance and processes established by business functions Archetype 2CIO,CDO,CTO,or similarMandate of Data or Tech function expanded to include Responsible AI in responsibility Archetype 3CRO,CCO,CLO,DPOor similarMandate of Risk,Privacy,Compliance or Legal Function expanded to includ

5、e RAI in responsibility Archetype 4AI Ethics Officer or similar Dedicated new function established with additional reporting lines and organizational structure-Non-exhaustive list of screened companies-Note:BCG does not provide legal advice|Source:BCG7(Gen)AI Risk Oversight|Options need to be evalua

6、ted based on their ability to execute independent oversight as well as their expertise levelsArchetype 1Business/Strategy OfficeArchetype 2CIO,CDO,CTO,or similarArchetype 3CRO,CCO,CLO,DPOor similarArchetype 4AI Ethics Officer or similar Separation of risk ownership and oversightLegal/Regulatory Expe

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要讨论了通过整合治理计划管理监管义务的主题。会议欢迎和介绍了演讲者,并概述了整合人工智能治理的议程。文章指出,企业处于人工智能治理的不同阶段,需要的教育和工具需求也各不相同。调查显示,有四种类型的(Generative)人工智能风险监督架构。文章详细介绍了IBM的AI伦理委员会,强调了其在信任建设和治理中的中心作用。此外,还讨论了整合合规和个人信息管理系统(PIMS)的方法。最后,文章提出了一个关于模型生命周期管理、数据治理和AI系统构建的全面治理框架,并鼓励与会者填写演讲评估表以提供反馈。
"如何通过整合治理程序管理监管义务?" "企业如何投资于整合人工智能治理框架?" "人工智能治理旅程中,企业面临哪些挑战和机遇?"
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠