当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

解释年金和一次性付款期权的估值.pdf

上传人: 一*** 编号:653322 2025-05-01 22页 1.17MB

1、|1Explaining the Valuation of Annuities and Lumpsum Options The Role of PreferencesEduard PondsJoint work with Niek Hensen and Jane SpliethoffIPRA-ParisJune 12,2024|Motivation Netherlands is an annuity country Pension funds must pay out pensions as a life-long annuity 2024:Lumpsum as new option(maxi

2、mum 10%of pension capital at retirement)Issues pension fund industry Fear big run on the lumpsum option How to communicate this new product properly(choice architecture)?Research question paper:We ask respondents to give a(financial)value to the 10%lumpsum option and the 10%annuityoptions?What can w

3、e learn from this valuation for choice architecture?June 1,20232|3Degree of annuitizationDegree of annuitisation pension wealth at retirement in workplacepension plans|Literature mainly focused on explaining the actual annuity decisions byplan participants(cf.Agnew et al.2008,Schreiber&Weber 2016,Br

4、own 2007,Alexandra&Gatzert 2019,Lambregts&Schut,2022).Stylized model Yaari(1965):100%annuitisation Rational economic perspective(Im)patience Bequests Life expectancy Institutional aspects:-Public pensions,-Taxation,-Role social partners in plan design Behavioral economic perspective Present bias(tim

5、e inconsistency)Cognitive constraintsExplaing Annuity DECISIONS4Annuity take up is still a puzzle|Different route:use the information from doing a valuation task:Ask respondents to value both options and use this information to improve the understanding of annuitydecision making We ask respondents t

6、wo questions:Q1 How much lumpsum do you want in return for 10%of your annuity position?Q2 How much annuity do you want in return for a lumpsum position equal to 10%of pension pot?InspirationBrown,J.R.,Kapteyn,A.,Luttmer,E.F.,&Mitchell,O.S.(2017).Cognitive constraints on valuing annuities.Journal of

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文探讨了荷兰养老金基金参与者面对新的选择——终身年金和一笔过现金(lumpsum)时的偏好。研究基于偏好解释了估值,并提出了一个估值框架,其中偏好驱动了估值,且终身年金和一笔过现金的价值并不相同。文章指出,对于“收入确定性”群体,他们倾向于选择终身年金,而对于“灵活性”群体,他们更偏好一笔过现金。研究还发现,当受访者表示使用了某种形式的计算方法时,他们的估值更加现实,且预示着退休时的选择。文章通过逻辑回归分析发现,对终身年金的欣赏与对一笔过现金的需求之间存在正相关,而损失厌恶则与对终身年金的需求正相关。此外,文章还探讨了税收对选择的影响,发现渐进式税收对选择一笔过现金有负面影响。总体而言,本文的研究结果为养老金基金的选择架构提供了输入,并强调了在设计退休产品时考虑个人偏好的重要性。
"如何看待荷兰养老金领取方式的变化?" annuity 与 lumpsum 哪个更受欢迎?" "荷兰养老金参与者如何评估 annuity 和 lumpsum 选项?"
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠