3-1 Olnes.pdf

1、The business case for actors in the EUDI Wallet ecosystemJon lnes,Esther MakaaySignicatENISA Trust Services and eID ForumSplit,Croatia,2025.09.24Disclaimer2Please note that this presentation is for information purposes only,and that Signicat has no obligation to pursue any course of business outline

2、d in this presentation or to develop or release any functionality mentioned in this presentation.The future strategy and possible future developments by Signicat are subject to change and may be changed by Signicat at any time for any reason without notice.This document is provided without a warrant

3、y of any kind,either express or implied,including but not limited to,the implied warranties of merchantability,fitness for a particular purpose,or non-infringement.Signicat assumesno responsibility for errors or omissions in this document.Two business models:a)Commercial sustainable income from paym

4、entsb)Government fundingDo we want an EUDIW ecosystem completely funded by government?Unless trust service providers get paid,there will be no trust services for the EUDI Wallet,e.g.no qualified electronic attestation of attributes.How can a“recognised”EUDI Wallet provider get paid?How can the(Q)EAA

5、 provider get paid?How can the QES provider get paid?Providers must take on liability that comes with a costGovernments rarely take on liabilityAuthentic source(Q)EAA provider1.Source pays hires(Q)EAA provider to fix complexity2.User pays your driving license may not be for free3.Service provider pa

6、ys requests attestations(pay EAA provider,in theory pay user)4.Government pays contracting one or more(Q)EAA providersEUDI Wallet ecosystem should allow all of these payment modelsEnd-userIdentitywalletAttribute attestationsOther sourceRelying partyService providerThe challengesPayment not embedded