当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

评估肾细胞癌临床试验机会的全球差异.pdf

上传人: 明**** 编号:1012457 2025-12-21 9页 534.24KB

1、Evaluating Global Disparities in Clinical Trial Availability for Renal Cell CarcinomaRuchi Agarwal1*,J.Goud2*,M.Zugman2,D.Castro2,X.Li2,K.Shah2,L.Lau2,A.Lee2,S.Jaime-Casas2,H.Ebrahimi2,G.Regalado-Porras3,S.Choi4,N.Sobrevilla-Moreno5,E.Ruiz-Garcia5,S.Kooner2,S.Reid2,N.Chaudhary2,R.McKay4,S.Pal2,and R

2、.Barragan-Carrillo2,51 University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia,PA,USA 2 City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center,Duarte,CA,USA3 ABC Medical Center,Mexico City,MX4 University of California San Diego,La Jolla,CA,USA5 National Cancer Institute of Mexico,Mexico City,MX*Equal contribution Background:Clin

3、ical trials are key to generating high-quality evidence to improve patient outcomes.In metastatic renal cell carcinoma,research over the past two decades has resulted in a fourfold increase in median overall survival(Lancet,2024).Most trials are conducted in high-income countries(HICs),limiting the

4、inclusion of diverse patient populations(JCO CCI,2020).Aim:To assess the global distribution of renal cell carcinoma(RCC)clinical trials and identify disparities by country income level.Methodology:EXCLUSION ZONE Queried the National Clinical Trials database for RCC trials enrolling patients between

5、 June 2019 and June 2024,excluding non-interventional,pediatric,and non-RCC trials.Countries were categorized by World Bank Ranking(WBR):high-income countries(HICs),upper-middle-income countries(UMICs),lower-middle-income countries(LMICs),and low-income countries(LICs).Analyses included:Descriptive

6、statistics for trial characteristics(e.g.,histology,phase,stage,etc.)Kruskal-Wallis test for differences by income level Poisson regression to assess links with income,gross national income(GNI),health spending,and RCC burdenResults:A total of 357 eligible trials were identified.Most(N=273;76%)were

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
根据文章内容,以下是全文主要内容的概括: 1. 研究发现,大多数(76%)的肾细胞癌(RCC)临床试验在高收入国家(HICs)进行。 2. 只有24%的试验包括来自中上收入国家(UMICs)、中低收入国家(LMICs)或低收入国家(LICs)的参与。 3. 在不同收入水平之间,RCC亚型或疾病阶段没有显著差异。 4. 药企资助的试验在非HICs中更多(64.3% vs. 39.6%),而政府/学术资助的试验在HICs中更多(60.4% vs. 35.7%)。 5. 多国试验在非HICs中更常见(45.2% vs. 15.8%)。 6. GNI、卫生支出和RCC死亡率与每国的临床试验数量显著相关。
"全球临床试验分布不均" 贫富差距大" 谁在主导?"
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠