1、Sphera survey data(2025)The 2026 Supply Chain Risk ReportREPORT 2 OF 22WHATS INSIDEWhats InsideExecutive Summary3Where Leaders Think Risk Comes From vs Where Its Materialising12AI:Adoption Is High,Impact Is Capped by Foundations22The Confidence Gap(the paradox lives here)5Why the Resilience Playbook
2、 Plateaued142026 Implications:7 Concrete Shifts24Governance:Scrutiny and Defensibility Requirements8The Bottlenecks:N-Tier Visibility,Supplier Engagement,Data Integrity,and ROI16Outcomes:Disruptions and Loss Remain Widespread,While Key Risks Rise10Operating Tempo:Desired Speed vs Actual Cycle Times2
3、03EXECUTIVE SUMMARYExecutive Summary.The 2025 survey data provides a perception-based view of how organisations assess their supply chain risk readiness heading into 2026.The analysis draws on four Censuswide surveys commissioned by Sphera quarterly throughout 2025,capturing responses from 800 Chief
4、 Procurement Officers and Chief Supply Chain Officers across the United States,United Kingdom,Germany and Canada.When read alongside Spheras incident monitoring data,a clear pattern emerges:leaders express very high confidence in their capabilities,yet the outcomes and constraints they report,point
5、to underlying structural fragility that continues to drive disruption and loss.Governance pressure is now continuous.Supplier and supply chain risk decisions are challenged frequently by boards,CFOs and senior executives(48.5%weekly/monthly;46.5%quarterly).This is not episodic oversight.It reflects
6、an operating environment where supply chain risk decisions are treated as strategic and financially material,and where teams are expected to justify recommendations with defensible evidence.Confidence,however,remains near-universal at the headline level.Respondents report extremely high confidence i