当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 中译版报告详情

美国信息技术与创新基金会(ITIF):2025数字反垄断监管政策制定者指南(中译版)(24页).pdf

上传人: Y**** 编号:621514 2025-04-02 24页 402.69KB

下载:

1、 itif.org A Policymakers Guide to Digital Antitrust Regulation JOSEPH V.CONIGLIO,LILLA NRA KISS,GIORGIO CASTIGLIA,AND HADI HOUALLA|MARCH 2025 Rather than adopt the European Unions model for regulating competition,policymakers considering how to govern digital markets should carefully evaluate whethe

2、r digital antitrust regulation is justified and consider whether concerns about anticompetitive behavior can be addressed with less intrusive and more cost-effective tools.KEY TAKEAWAYS The European Unions Digital Markets Act has inspired an array of similar proposals for ex ante antitrust regulatio

3、n around the world,including in Brazil,India,the United Kingdom,South Korea,and Japan.Policymakers can be tempted to implement a digital antitrust regulation(DAR)to address any one of several economic,political,and moral concerns that,upon examination,may prove to be unfounded.While digital markets

4、are not immune to anticompetitive outcomes,a DAR should only be adopted if there is real market failure and if its adoption would improve the status quo relative to nonregulation.DARs are likely to encounter difficulties with ensuring that regulators have both the necessary abilities to enhance cons

5、umer welfare as well as sufficient incentives for them to serve the public interest.Jurisdictions should evaluate whether alternatives to a DAR,such as enforcing or amending their ex post competition laws,are more effective and less costly ways to address competition concerns in digital markets.INFO

6、RMATION TECHNOLOGY&INNOVATION FOUNDATION|MARCH 2025 PAGE 2 CONTENTS Key Takeaways.1 Introduction.2 Why Regulate Digital Markets?.3 An Overview of DARs worldwide.7 Common Problems With Digital Antitrust Regulations.10 DARs Present Difficult Trade-offs.13 Recommendations for Jurisdictions Considering

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要讨论了数字反垄断法规(DAR)的合理性和必要性。文章首先指出,尽管一些国家正在考虑或实施DAR,但它们通常基于不充分的理由,如数字市场的特殊性、市场失败、消费者和中小企业保护、数字主权等。然而,这些理由大多缺乏证据支持,且与数字市场的实际情况不符。 文章进一步指出,DAR面临的主要问题包括知识问题、效率损失、合规成本、监管捕获、依赖行业等。这些问题在数字市场中尤为严重,可能导致监管效果不佳,甚至损害公共利益。 最后,文章建议,在考虑DAR之前,政策制定者应首先评估市场失败的存在,并优先执行现有的竞争法。如果需要监管,应针对特定市场进行定制,避免使用过于严厉的补救措施。总的来说,DAR可能不是解决数字市场问题的最佳途径。
数字反垄断法规的必要性是什么? 数字市场与传统市场有何不同? 数字反垄断法规如何影响消费者和中小企业?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠