当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 报告详情

ITIF:2024评估云信任的技术和法律标准研究报告(英文版)(42页).pdf

上传人: Y**** 编号:402367 2024-12-31 42页 640.36KB

下载:

1、 itif.org Technical and Legal Criteria for Assessing Cloud Trustworthiness NIGEL CORY|APRIL 2024 Global data and technology governance will be challenging without cooperation on cloud trustworthiness.Policymakers should avoid simplistic assessments based on nationality and instead develop more holis

2、tic assessments based on legal and technical criteria.KEY TAKEAWAYS Concerns about trusting cloud services have existed since their creation,but recent concerns about governments compelling access to cloud firms data and services are leading to misguided knee-jerk reactions based on nationality.Focu

3、sing solely on a firms nationality without considering how a firm or its home country contributes to or detracts from cloud trustworthiness does little to enhance cloud cybersecurity and data privacy and create an open and competitive cloud market.China looms over cloud trustworthiness assessments,b

4、ut its much broader.G7 and like-minded countries have a mixed record with policies that both fracture the cloud and provide the basis for a more cooperative approach to cloud trustworthiness.Policymakers at the G7,OECD,and elsewhere should establish technical and legal criteria for evaluating cloud

5、trustworthiness rather than relying on vague national security and intelligence concerns.If countries trust each other in contexts such as defense,intelligence,law enforcement,and trade,but they dont trust each others cloud firms,then how are they supposed to work together,and with third countries,o

6、n other tech issues?A diverse set of legal and technical criteria gives firms,and their host countries,a clear goal to work toward.Concerns about cloud trustworthiness are global and not just an issue for the European Union,the United States,and China.INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY&INNOVATION FOUNDATION|APR

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要讨论了评估云可信度的技术和法律标准。文章指出,全球数据和技术治理面临挑战,需要各国在云可信度方面进行合作。作者建议政策制定者应避免基于国籍的简单评估,而应基于法律和技术标准进行更全面的评估。文章还指出,仅关注公司的国籍而不考虑其对云可信度的贡献或损害,无助于提高云网络安全和数据隐私,也无法创造一个开放和竞争的云市场。 文章提出了一系列评估云可信度的技术和法律标准,包括使用国际技术标准提供详细和共同的定义、概念、用例和标准;进行跨云网络安全体系的映射,以识别和使用共同的 technical 控制和标准;政府对数据的访问:评估法律框架和实际情况;云公司和政府的透明度和公开性,以及与当地网络安全机构的合作为云可信度提供关键的透明度和数据。 文章还通过澳大利亚、哥斯达黎加、捷克共和国、欧盟、法国、德国、印度、韩国、罗马尼亚、英国和美国等国家的案例研究,强调了在考虑如何制定云可信度评估标准时,既有建设性又有问题的政策。 总的来说,文章呼吁G7、OECD和其他政策制定者建立具体的技术和法律标准来评估云可信度,而不是依赖模糊的国家安全和情报问题。
如何评估云服务的可信度? 各国如何制定云服务可信度标准? 云服务可信度对全球数据治理有何影响?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠