当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 报告详情

ITIF:2024企业集中度对生产力和薪资的积极影响分析报告(英文版)(25页).pdf

上传人: 白**** 编号:402027 2024-12-29 25页 653.45KB

下载:

1、 itif.org Corporate Concentration Is Good for Productivity and Wages TRELYSA LONG|MAY 2024 Despite claims by anticorporate neo-Brandeisians,corporate concentration appears positively correlated with higher productivity and wages.So,the push to break up large companies is antiworker and anti-middle c

2、lass.KEY TAKEAWAYS Contrary to the prevailing anticorporate narrative,concentration rose only about 1 percentage point from 34.3 percent in 2002 to 35.3 percent in 2017and the industries that were most concentrated in 2002 became less concentrated by 2017.In the same period,the most recent Census da

3、ta available shows there was a positive correlation(0.29)between change in productivity and change wages:Industries that became more concentrated over time also became more productive.The more concentrated an industry was in 2002,the higher its productivity growth from 2002 to 2017a correlation of 0

4、.25.Industries that were more concentrated in 2002 also saw higher increases in hourly compensation from 2002 to 2017a correlation of 0.23.Given the fact that bigger firms on average tend to spur higher productivity and wages,policymakers should recognize that the current campaign to break up large

5、firms is counterproductive.The Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission should modify the 2023 Merger Guidelines to be more favorable to mergers,especially those that result in minimal price increases but significant productivity gains.INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY&INNOVATION FOUNDATION|MAY 2024 PAG

6、E 2 CONTENTS Key Takeaways.1 Introduction.2 Rebutting The Argument That Concentration Hurts Productivity and Wages.5 Concentration and Labor Productivity.8 Concentration and Labor Compensation.12 Implications and Policy Recommendations.18 Conclusion.20 Endnotes.21 INTRODUCTION In recent years,a grow

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要内容为: 1. 文章反驳了反企业的新布兰代斯学派关于企业集中度上升导致生产率下降和工资停滞的观点。文章指出,从2002年到2017年,美国企业集中度只上升了1个百分点,且在2002年最集中的行业到2017年变得不那么集中了。 2. 文章分析了企业集中度与生产率之间的关系,发现集中度较高的行业往往生产率增长也较高。例如,2002年集中度最高的四个行业,2002年到2017年生产率平均增长了111%。 3. 文章还分析了企业集中度与工资之间的关系,发现集中度较高的行业往往工资增长也较快。例如,2002年集中度最高的四个行业,2002年到2017年小时工资平均增长了70%。 4. 文章建议政策制定者应该修改2023年的并购指南,鼓励企业合并,尤其是那些导致价格略有上升但生产率显著提高的并购。
企业集中度提高是否真的能提高生产力和工资水平? 大型企业是否真的会通过垄断市场来压低工资? 政策制定者应该如何调整并购政策以促进企业规模增长和生产力提升?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠