当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 报告详情

Javelin:2022年小企业数字银行供应商评估报告(英文版)(61页).pdf

上传人: Y**** 编号:143150 2023-10-18 61页 2.78MB

下载:

1、2022 SMALL BUSINESS DIGITAL BANKING VENDOR SCORECARD DECEMBER 2022 Javelin Advisory Services|Small Business BankingAnnouncing 2022 Winners 2 2022 SMALL BUSINESS DIGITAL BANKING VENDOR SCORECARD 2022 Escalent and/or its affiliates.All rights reserved.PRIMARY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE AUTHOR OVERVIEW Javeli

2、ns 2022 Small Business Digital Banking Vendor Scorecard evaluates six vendors with products aimed at banks and credit unions servicing small businesses,a segment vital to their survival and where they face significant competitive headwinds.The vendors are rated across three major categories,from use

3、r experience to administration to strategic vision,and were assessed based on 380 features and functionalities.Q2 was the overall winner with its single-platform approach to digital business banking,allowing client FIs to make their own decisions about the products and services they offer to their b

4、usiness customers.Apiture and NCR followed close behind in the top tier of vendors,and the field was defined overall by a shrinking gap between the leaders and the laggards as commoditization takes hold in the industry.AUDIENCE:Financial institutions:Senior strategists,product managers,and marketers

5、 responsible for small-business digital banking.Vendors:Online and mobile banking platform providers,core vendors.Third parties and fintechs:Digital strategists at companies providing payments and other financial services to small businesses.CONTRIBUTORS:Mark Schwanhausser Director of Digital Bankin

6、g Emmett Higdon Director of Digital Banking What criteria should banks and credit unions use to evaluate digital banking vendors?Which vendors are leading the way in terms of features and functionality,banker-facing tools,and strategic direction?What feature and UX best practices can FIs learn from

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要介绍了2022年小型企业数字银行供应商评分卡的结果。Q2在整体上名列第一,因其实现了长期宣传的“单一平台”方法,使银行和信用联社的客户能够根据个别需求自行决定向企业客户提供哪些产品和服务。Apiture和NCR紧随其后,位于供应商的顶级。供应商之间的差距正在缩小,许多业务银行功能已成为标配,数字银行和支付平台本身已趋于商品化。文章还指出,许多银行和信用联社正在进入小型企业市场,但并不想成为银行。大多数供应商都看到了来自信用联社的新兴趣,这些信用联社无论是现有的消费者平台客户还是新客户和潜在客户,都希望满足其成员的银行业务需求。此外,文章还提到,移动银行正在成为企业银行的前景。与消费者相比,企业主在依赖移动银行方面一直犹豫不决,但这种疑虑正在慢慢改变。供应商的下一步将是确保用户体验是为移动设备而设计的,而不是简单地复制桌面上的内容。
哪些供应商在数字银行功能和用户体验方面表现最佳? 供应商如何通过战略愿景和路线图来区分自己? 银行和信用联社如何利用数字银行平台来提升客户参与度?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠